As always, I really enoyed Dr. Sexons class this semester. One can always count on his class to be entertaining as well as informative. It is for professors like him that I chose to study English. He, like Nabokov himself, is a receptacle of knowledge that has made us all smarter people. I enjoyed the atmosphere of the class as well as the subject matter.
Although at times I found the reading extremely difficult, I enjoyed working my way up the never ending rungs of the latter of understanding with the rest of the class. I am significantly more confident in my reading abilities after this class because I have learned how to read at a more critical level. I really enjoyed all of the books except for Speak Memory. Don't get me wrong, it was extremely well written and the imagery is superb, but it most definitely did not induce a tingle in my spine. Nabokov's novels are by far the most complex and confusing ones that I have ever read, and had I tried to read them without the help of Dr. Sexon and my peers there is no way I would have understood even the texts at even their most basic levels.
So many thanks to you all for another great semester, see many of you in Emergent Lit next year.
Friday, December 11, 2009
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Final Paper
A Game of Worlds
Vladimir Nabokov is notorious for infusing his novels with intricately placed literary allusions as well as employing complex and confusing measures in order to create an ever evolving work of literature. His reoccurring use of themes such as memory, death, love and reality has amounted to a body of work that is both universally relevant and deliciously controversial. Although Nabokov’s novel Pale Fire is significantly less shockingly offensive than some of his other novels, it by no means lacks substance or thought provoking scenarios. The novel includes John Shades beautiful poem recollecting the death of his dear daughter as well as a forward, commentary and index written by Charles Kinbote. It is a story of love, betrayal, persecution, death and friendship among other things. Throughout the novel, various characters find themselves caught up in a game of worlds, a complex web of reality and imagination.
Although not the predominant theme of the novel as a whole, death plays a significant role both in Shade’s poem and Kinbote’s commentary. It is at times characterized as a source of anxiety, a seemingly finite form of escape, a tragic ending to the beautiful thing called life, as well as new beginning in a mysterious and curious world. Shade opens his poem “Pale Fire” with the image of a bird that has accidently flown into a window, resulting in its death. The lines proceed as follows, “I was the shadow of the waxwing slain/ By the false azure in the
windowpane;/ I was the smudge of ashen fluff—and I/ Lived on, flew on, in the reflected sky” (33). Although the bird has ceased to live in the tangible world, it continues to exist in an alternate world, a world of reflection. Death, in this sense, is therefore not definite. Although it may entail a change in physical state, the soul continues to soar long after it has left the body.
By conveying Hazel Shade’s story through poetry, John Shade creates a similar continuation of life after death for his daughter. “Pale Fire” is a literary reflection of the Shades’ life before Hazel’s suicide, and although she is no longer with them in body, her spirit lives on through his writing. Shade eternalizes the existence of his daughter by creating a new world for her to live through, and as long as the poem exists, so will she. His wife, although not yet deceased, is eternalized in the same way. Shade wrote, “And all the time, and all the time, my love,/ You too are there, beneath the word, above/ The syllable, to underscore and stress vital rhythm […]/ And all in you is youth, and you make a new, / By quoting them, old things I made for you” (68). The family’s legacy will live on, frozen in time, long after their bodies have become one with nature.
An alternative form of life after death is represented by the poltergeist, assumed to be the ghost of Aunt Maud, in the Shade’s barn. Although excluded from the poem, Kinbote informs the reader that a significant amount of paranormal activity took place within the barn as well as within the Shades’ house itself. While out in the barn alone one night, Hazel witnesses an eerie sight. A light, with no visible source, played on the wall of the barn and even rushed towards her. Hazel asked the light questions, and it would respond with certain movements. At one point it disappears, but then reappears shortly after with a new found eagerness to “resume the game” (188). Although such activity would indicate a form of life after death, it is much different than that created by Shade through his writing. It would seem that one’s spirit continues to live on in the same world as it had before, but in a different form. It represents death in a more solemn and less hopeful light. The spirit’s participation is such games might indicate a loneliness or discontentment in the afterlife.
After having a near death experience in which he gleans a white fountain, John Shade begins to more thoroughly contemplate death and his own existence. As an atheist he is void of the relief and assurance that some take from the notion of God. The “helpful” exercises provided by the Institute of Preparation for the Hereafter (IPH) were considered by him to be a waste of time. His hope to find truth within his deathly vision is destroyed due to a misprint in an article, but it leads him to another realization: “Yes! It sufficed that I in life could find/ Some kind of link-and-bobolink, some kind/ Of correlated pattern in the game,/ Plexed artistry, and something of the same/ Pleasure in it as they who played it found” (63). Life, he seems to imply, is just a game to be played. There is a beginning and an ending, and the in between is filled with “topsy-turvical coincidence” (63) and premeditated moves confused by other players. He wrote, “I feel I understand/ Existence, or at least a minute part/ Of my existence, only through my art,/ In terms of combinational delight;/ And if my private universe scans right,/ So does the verse of galaxies divine/ Which I suspect is an iambic line” (69). Literature is therefore not only a means to escape death, but a method of finding meaning in life. He seems to find solace in this notion and devoted himself to writing.
Kinbote utilizes literature to not only make sense of his own existence, but to create a new and fantastical story to replace it. Through manipulation of Shade’s poem, he creates a fantasy world, complete with heroes and villains. Although the northern country of Zembla is a figment of Kinbote’s imagination, fragments of various authors’ alternate realities can be found strewn throughout the world he has constructed. The most obvious contributor to Kinbote’s story is, of course, John Shade. Because Kinbote is claiming to simply provide a commentary for Shade’s poem, he is forced to incorporate at least some of Shade’s ideas into his own narrative. Kinbote even admits to this when he says, “I have reread, not without pleasure, my comments to his lines, and in many cases have caught myself borrowing a kind of opalescent light from my poet’s fiery orb”(81). Just as the moon reflects the dazzling rays of the sun, Kinbote’s story contains elements of Shade’s genius.
Even so, Kinbote has a tendency to manipulate the words employed by Shade to serve his own needs. For example, Kinbote takes two words, on from line 17 and the other from line 29, and unites them to come up with “gradual, gray” (77). From this pairing, Kinbote extracts the name Jakob Gradus. Not only were these lines not originally referring to a male, but they were 12 lines apart and had completely different contexts. Numerous other “notes” are comprised of one to two sentences discussing Shade’s words followed by one or more pages discussing something completely extraneous to the poem. It is through this method that Kinbote tells his own story since Shade did not.
Another author who has an obvious influence on Kinbote’s, and Shade’s, story is the infamous William Shakespeare. Not only does Kinbote carry around a copy of Shakespeare’s Timon of Athens, but his own story is comparable to that of Timon. Like Timon, Charles the Beloved, aka Charles Kinbote, begins as loved man of high social status and then experiences a fall and rejection from his people. Both men succumb to rather solitary lives and then find a treasure (John Shade’s poem in Kinbote’s case), and in the end both leave a written document behind (Kinbote leaves writes his commentary and Timon leaves his epitaph. Another allusion to Shakespeare can be found in the names of the streets of Zembla: Timon Alley, Academy Boulevard and Coriolanus Lane (126). His utilization of components such as these from other authors’ works simply serve to complicate and enrich his own creation.
Kinbote incorporats aspects of his surroundings into his story as well. Perhaps the most obvious instance of this is his creation of Jakob Gradus, aka Jack Degree, Jacques de Grey, James de Gray, Raventstone, Ravus and d’Argus (77). Although Kinbote claims that Gradus “makes his way through the entire length of the poem, following the road of the rhythm, riding past in a rhyme, […] hiding between two words, reappearing on the horizon of a new canto, steadily marching nearer in iambic motion, […] and falling asleep as the poet lays down his pen for the night” (78), he is not a real person. That is to say that Gradus, the Shadow searching for the Zemblan king, is not a real person. In fact, his character is based on Jack Grey, the real revenge seeking man that Judge Goldsworth had put away years ago. Contrary to what Kinbote claims, Gradus did not exist before Grey shot Shade. He was a figment of the imagination of a creative, and perhaps slightly psychotic, man brought forth by an actual occurance.
Throughout the novel, the question begs to be asked: What is reality? Is it something that is universally true or tangible? Can it be portrayed objectively through art, or is there even such a thing as an objective reality? Nabokov plays with the notion of “reality” within many of his novels, and Pale Fire is no exception. From Kinbote’s crazed rantings regarding a king on the run, to Shade’s representation of her daughter, the concept of reality is brought into play. Although it becomes clear after reading the book that Kinbote’s tale does not hold true to fact, he states, "Without my notes Shade’s text simply has no human reality at all since the human reality of such poem as his (being too skittish and reticent for an autobiographical work), with the omission of many pithy lines carelessly rejected by him, has to depend entirely on the reality of its author and his surroundings, attachments and so forth, a reality that only my notes can provide" (29). Yet when question about the veracity of his story he also says, “Once transmuted by you into poetry, the stuff will be true, and the people will come alive” (214). On the one hand, he states that that which Shade has written does not adhere to reality, but on the other he claims that once he has written something it becomes true. I am not one to presume that I know what Nabokov believed about reality, but in my opinion, it is kind of a mixture of both of the claims that Kinbote made.
In writing their stories, both Shade and Kinbote created alternate realities, or invented worlds based somewhat on that which is “real” and somewhat on that which they wished was “real.” Kinbote says that “‘reality’ is neither the subject nor the object of the true art which creates its own special reality having nothing to do with the average ‘reality’ perceived by the communal eye” (130). Reality is subjective and therefore different for everyone. A piece of art or literature is a reflection of one’s perceived reality. It is composed of bits and pieces from one’s own life and experiences and those of others. It is a miniature world built upon thousands of other worlds constructed by other people.
Kinbote’s reverence for Shade can be seen when he says, “I am witnessing a unique physiological moment: John Shade perceiving and transforming the world, taking it in and taking it apart, re-combining its elements in the very process of storing them up so as to produce at some unspecified date an organic miracle, a fusion of image and music, a line of verse” (27). Composing a piece of literature is like a game of chess. At the beginning the playing board is filled with numerous pieces that have the potential to overpower their opponents. Over extended periods of time during which different options are thoroughly mulled over, the pieces are moved around, resulting in the removal of certain ideas/pieces from the playing field. It is the combination of the remaining pieces at the end that make up amazing compositions such as those written by Vladimir Nabokov.
Like Shade and Kinbote, both figments of his own imagination, Nabokov breaks everything down into their very basic molecules and then builds something completely different from them. His unique worlds/novels are composed of bits and pieces of hundreds of other worlds, and each piece has its own designated place and specific meaning. When reading his novels, one thing that is crucial to understand is that when we as readers go over his writing we bring new meaning to it. Like Kinbote, we create our own worlds based upon that which has been presented to us because reality and interpretation are subjective. It is for this reason that Nabokov’s works will forever evolve, and with each reading there will always be new treasures to be discovered.
Vladimir Nabokov is notorious for infusing his novels with intricately placed literary allusions as well as employing complex and confusing measures in order to create an ever evolving work of literature. His reoccurring use of themes such as memory, death, love and reality has amounted to a body of work that is both universally relevant and deliciously controversial. Although Nabokov’s novel Pale Fire is significantly less shockingly offensive than some of his other novels, it by no means lacks substance or thought provoking scenarios. The novel includes John Shades beautiful poem recollecting the death of his dear daughter as well as a forward, commentary and index written by Charles Kinbote. It is a story of love, betrayal, persecution, death and friendship among other things. Throughout the novel, various characters find themselves caught up in a game of worlds, a complex web of reality and imagination.
Although not the predominant theme of the novel as a whole, death plays a significant role both in Shade’s poem and Kinbote’s commentary. It is at times characterized as a source of anxiety, a seemingly finite form of escape, a tragic ending to the beautiful thing called life, as well as new beginning in a mysterious and curious world. Shade opens his poem “Pale Fire” with the image of a bird that has accidently flown into a window, resulting in its death. The lines proceed as follows, “I was the shadow of the waxwing slain/ By the false azure in the
windowpane;/ I was the smudge of ashen fluff—and I/ Lived on, flew on, in the reflected sky” (33). Although the bird has ceased to live in the tangible world, it continues to exist in an alternate world, a world of reflection. Death, in this sense, is therefore not definite. Although it may entail a change in physical state, the soul continues to soar long after it has left the body.
By conveying Hazel Shade’s story through poetry, John Shade creates a similar continuation of life after death for his daughter. “Pale Fire” is a literary reflection of the Shades’ life before Hazel’s suicide, and although she is no longer with them in body, her spirit lives on through his writing. Shade eternalizes the existence of his daughter by creating a new world for her to live through, and as long as the poem exists, so will she. His wife, although not yet deceased, is eternalized in the same way. Shade wrote, “And all the time, and all the time, my love,/ You too are there, beneath the word, above/ The syllable, to underscore and stress vital rhythm […]/ And all in you is youth, and you make a new, / By quoting them, old things I made for you” (68). The family’s legacy will live on, frozen in time, long after their bodies have become one with nature.
An alternative form of life after death is represented by the poltergeist, assumed to be the ghost of Aunt Maud, in the Shade’s barn. Although excluded from the poem, Kinbote informs the reader that a significant amount of paranormal activity took place within the barn as well as within the Shades’ house itself. While out in the barn alone one night, Hazel witnesses an eerie sight. A light, with no visible source, played on the wall of the barn and even rushed towards her. Hazel asked the light questions, and it would respond with certain movements. At one point it disappears, but then reappears shortly after with a new found eagerness to “resume the game” (188). Although such activity would indicate a form of life after death, it is much different than that created by Shade through his writing. It would seem that one’s spirit continues to live on in the same world as it had before, but in a different form. It represents death in a more solemn and less hopeful light. The spirit’s participation is such games might indicate a loneliness or discontentment in the afterlife.
After having a near death experience in which he gleans a white fountain, John Shade begins to more thoroughly contemplate death and his own existence. As an atheist he is void of the relief and assurance that some take from the notion of God. The “helpful” exercises provided by the Institute of Preparation for the Hereafter (IPH) were considered by him to be a waste of time. His hope to find truth within his deathly vision is destroyed due to a misprint in an article, but it leads him to another realization: “Yes! It sufficed that I in life could find/ Some kind of link-and-bobolink, some kind/ Of correlated pattern in the game,/ Plexed artistry, and something of the same/ Pleasure in it as they who played it found” (63). Life, he seems to imply, is just a game to be played. There is a beginning and an ending, and the in between is filled with “topsy-turvical coincidence” (63) and premeditated moves confused by other players. He wrote, “I feel I understand/ Existence, or at least a minute part/ Of my existence, only through my art,/ In terms of combinational delight;/ And if my private universe scans right,/ So does the verse of galaxies divine/ Which I suspect is an iambic line” (69). Literature is therefore not only a means to escape death, but a method of finding meaning in life. He seems to find solace in this notion and devoted himself to writing.
Kinbote utilizes literature to not only make sense of his own existence, but to create a new and fantastical story to replace it. Through manipulation of Shade’s poem, he creates a fantasy world, complete with heroes and villains. Although the northern country of Zembla is a figment of Kinbote’s imagination, fragments of various authors’ alternate realities can be found strewn throughout the world he has constructed. The most obvious contributor to Kinbote’s story is, of course, John Shade. Because Kinbote is claiming to simply provide a commentary for Shade’s poem, he is forced to incorporate at least some of Shade’s ideas into his own narrative. Kinbote even admits to this when he says, “I have reread, not without pleasure, my comments to his lines, and in many cases have caught myself borrowing a kind of opalescent light from my poet’s fiery orb”(81). Just as the moon reflects the dazzling rays of the sun, Kinbote’s story contains elements of Shade’s genius.
Even so, Kinbote has a tendency to manipulate the words employed by Shade to serve his own needs. For example, Kinbote takes two words, on from line 17 and the other from line 29, and unites them to come up with “gradual, gray” (77). From this pairing, Kinbote extracts the name Jakob Gradus. Not only were these lines not originally referring to a male, but they were 12 lines apart and had completely different contexts. Numerous other “notes” are comprised of one to two sentences discussing Shade’s words followed by one or more pages discussing something completely extraneous to the poem. It is through this method that Kinbote tells his own story since Shade did not.
Another author who has an obvious influence on Kinbote’s, and Shade’s, story is the infamous William Shakespeare. Not only does Kinbote carry around a copy of Shakespeare’s Timon of Athens, but his own story is comparable to that of Timon. Like Timon, Charles the Beloved, aka Charles Kinbote, begins as loved man of high social status and then experiences a fall and rejection from his people. Both men succumb to rather solitary lives and then find a treasure (John Shade’s poem in Kinbote’s case), and in the end both leave a written document behind (Kinbote leaves writes his commentary and Timon leaves his epitaph. Another allusion to Shakespeare can be found in the names of the streets of Zembla: Timon Alley, Academy Boulevard and Coriolanus Lane (126). His utilization of components such as these from other authors’ works simply serve to complicate and enrich his own creation.
Kinbote incorporats aspects of his surroundings into his story as well. Perhaps the most obvious instance of this is his creation of Jakob Gradus, aka Jack Degree, Jacques de Grey, James de Gray, Raventstone, Ravus and d’Argus (77). Although Kinbote claims that Gradus “makes his way through the entire length of the poem, following the road of the rhythm, riding past in a rhyme, […] hiding between two words, reappearing on the horizon of a new canto, steadily marching nearer in iambic motion, […] and falling asleep as the poet lays down his pen for the night” (78), he is not a real person. That is to say that Gradus, the Shadow searching for the Zemblan king, is not a real person. In fact, his character is based on Jack Grey, the real revenge seeking man that Judge Goldsworth had put away years ago. Contrary to what Kinbote claims, Gradus did not exist before Grey shot Shade. He was a figment of the imagination of a creative, and perhaps slightly psychotic, man brought forth by an actual occurance.
Throughout the novel, the question begs to be asked: What is reality? Is it something that is universally true or tangible? Can it be portrayed objectively through art, or is there even such a thing as an objective reality? Nabokov plays with the notion of “reality” within many of his novels, and Pale Fire is no exception. From Kinbote’s crazed rantings regarding a king on the run, to Shade’s representation of her daughter, the concept of reality is brought into play. Although it becomes clear after reading the book that Kinbote’s tale does not hold true to fact, he states, "Without my notes Shade’s text simply has no human reality at all since the human reality of such poem as his (being too skittish and reticent for an autobiographical work), with the omission of many pithy lines carelessly rejected by him, has to depend entirely on the reality of its author and his surroundings, attachments and so forth, a reality that only my notes can provide" (29). Yet when question about the veracity of his story he also says, “Once transmuted by you into poetry, the stuff will be true, and the people will come alive” (214). On the one hand, he states that that which Shade has written does not adhere to reality, but on the other he claims that once he has written something it becomes true. I am not one to presume that I know what Nabokov believed about reality, but in my opinion, it is kind of a mixture of both of the claims that Kinbote made.
In writing their stories, both Shade and Kinbote created alternate realities, or invented worlds based somewhat on that which is “real” and somewhat on that which they wished was “real.” Kinbote says that “‘reality’ is neither the subject nor the object of the true art which creates its own special reality having nothing to do with the average ‘reality’ perceived by the communal eye” (130). Reality is subjective and therefore different for everyone. A piece of art or literature is a reflection of one’s perceived reality. It is composed of bits and pieces from one’s own life and experiences and those of others. It is a miniature world built upon thousands of other worlds constructed by other people.
Kinbote’s reverence for Shade can be seen when he says, “I am witnessing a unique physiological moment: John Shade perceiving and transforming the world, taking it in and taking it apart, re-combining its elements in the very process of storing them up so as to produce at some unspecified date an organic miracle, a fusion of image and music, a line of verse” (27). Composing a piece of literature is like a game of chess. At the beginning the playing board is filled with numerous pieces that have the potential to overpower their opponents. Over extended periods of time during which different options are thoroughly mulled over, the pieces are moved around, resulting in the removal of certain ideas/pieces from the playing field. It is the combination of the remaining pieces at the end that make up amazing compositions such as those written by Vladimir Nabokov.
Like Shade and Kinbote, both figments of his own imagination, Nabokov breaks everything down into their very basic molecules and then builds something completely different from them. His unique worlds/novels are composed of bits and pieces of hundreds of other worlds, and each piece has its own designated place and specific meaning. When reading his novels, one thing that is crucial to understand is that when we as readers go over his writing we bring new meaning to it. Like Kinbote, we create our own worlds based upon that which has been presented to us because reality and interpretation are subjective. It is for this reason that Nabokov’s works will forever evolve, and with each reading there will always be new treasures to be discovered.
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Day 2 of Group Presentations
Group 4 Presentation
Group 4's movie was extremely unique and well made. The images that were shown were most definitely great representations of Nabokov. All the chess scenes were cool, and it took me a while to get that as she read the book Nabokov's chess piece moved because the game of worlds had begun. The escape from Zembla scene was really funny, and I enjoyed the other little plays within the movie. The whole thing was kind of set up like a frame story would be, which was great since Nabokov employs that technique within some of his works as well.
Group 6 Presentation
This presentation was my favorite of the lot. It was extremely creative, and it was interesting to see each person's unique representation of a character and what they would have written. The characters portrayed in this presentation were Humbert, Lolita, Shade, and Kinbote as the commentator. There were 4 different poems/pieces, which corresponds with the 4 cantos of Shade's poem. I liked that they Incorporated our class list into their pieces, as well as some of the blogs of their fellow classmates. The poem written from Shade's point of view was my favorite because it was quite entertaining and funny. Like Shade's poem, it was rhymed. And I thought it was interesting that he is writing from his own afterlife, whereas in the novel he writes about the death of his daughter. Each person did a great job of embodying their character and writing in the way that their characters really would. It was obvious that they put a lot of time into it, and I enjoyed it a lot.
Group 6 Presentation
Like all of the other presentations, group 6's was quite entertaining. They looked at the way fairy tales were incorporated into Nabokov's Lolita. Some of the ones they played out were little red riding hood, the little mermaid, snow white, beauty and the beast, sleeping beauty, Frankenstein, and the story of Actaeon. The use of pictures from the computer as scene backdrops was creative, and the cops excerpt from the end was funny. The part where the guys were watching little girls at play was comical as well.
Overall, the presentations were great. Super creative as well as entertaining.
Group 4's movie was extremely unique and well made. The images that were shown were most definitely great representations of Nabokov. All the chess scenes were cool, and it took me a while to get that as she read the book Nabokov's chess piece moved because the game of worlds had begun. The escape from Zembla scene was really funny, and I enjoyed the other little plays within the movie. The whole thing was kind of set up like a frame story would be, which was great since Nabokov employs that technique within some of his works as well.
Group 6 Presentation
This presentation was my favorite of the lot. It was extremely creative, and it was interesting to see each person's unique representation of a character and what they would have written. The characters portrayed in this presentation were Humbert, Lolita, Shade, and Kinbote as the commentator. There were 4 different poems/pieces, which corresponds with the 4 cantos of Shade's poem. I liked that they Incorporated our class list into their pieces, as well as some of the blogs of their fellow classmates. The poem written from Shade's point of view was my favorite because it was quite entertaining and funny. Like Shade's poem, it was rhymed. And I thought it was interesting that he is writing from his own afterlife, whereas in the novel he writes about the death of his daughter. Each person did a great job of embodying their character and writing in the way that their characters really would. It was obvious that they put a lot of time into it, and I enjoyed it a lot.
Group 6 Presentation
Like all of the other presentations, group 6's was quite entertaining. They looked at the way fairy tales were incorporated into Nabokov's Lolita. Some of the ones they played out were little red riding hood, the little mermaid, snow white, beauty and the beast, sleeping beauty, Frankenstein, and the story of Actaeon. The use of pictures from the computer as scene backdrops was creative, and the cops excerpt from the end was funny. The part where the guys were watching little girls at play was comical as well.
Overall, the presentations were great. Super creative as well as entertaining.
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Presentatoin Day 1
Group 1 Presentation
I really liked how each person played a character from a Nabokov book, and how the different scenes were meant to be Nabokov's thoughts while he was writing on his note cards. I thought that it was really creative, as well as funny. Each person did a good job of portraying the character that they were supposed to be. My favorite one had to have been the portrayal of drunken Shade, since we all know that he has an alcohol problem. The back and forth portrayal of the scene between Humbert and Quilty in the enchanted hunters was really funny as well, and that is quite possibly my favorite scene in the book simple because of its humour.
Group 2 Presentation
I thought that group 2's presentation was really creative as well. The characters of Dolores (Lolita), Humbert, Kinbote, Quilty and Hazel Shade were all played and brought together in a talk show like setting. Kinbote's bit was obviously hilarious because he is so full of himself and has something to say about everything. Hazel Shade's character was quite interesting, and creepy, as well. The fact that they included Vivian Darkbloom (ie Vladimir Nabokov) as the interviewer was clever. A discovery that they included that I found interesting as well was the comparison of each character to a character in Greek mythology. Lolita was compared to Persephone because both girls were raped, and although crude, it was funny when she said, "Well at least I get some!" Of course Kinbote compared himself to Zeus, the almighty king of the Gods.
Group 3
That was ours
I really liked how each person played a character from a Nabokov book, and how the different scenes were meant to be Nabokov's thoughts while he was writing on his note cards. I thought that it was really creative, as well as funny. Each person did a good job of portraying the character that they were supposed to be. My favorite one had to have been the portrayal of drunken Shade, since we all know that he has an alcohol problem. The back and forth portrayal of the scene between Humbert and Quilty in the enchanted hunters was really funny as well, and that is quite possibly my favorite scene in the book simple because of its humour.
Group 2 Presentation
I thought that group 2's presentation was really creative as well. The characters of Dolores (Lolita), Humbert, Kinbote, Quilty and Hazel Shade were all played and brought together in a talk show like setting. Kinbote's bit was obviously hilarious because he is so full of himself and has something to say about everything. Hazel Shade's character was quite interesting, and creepy, as well. The fact that they included Vivian Darkbloom (ie Vladimir Nabokov) as the interviewer was clever. A discovery that they included that I found interesting as well was the comparison of each character to a character in Greek mythology. Lolita was compared to Persephone because both girls were raped, and although crude, it was funny when she said, "Well at least I get some!" Of course Kinbote compared himself to Zeus, the almighty king of the Gods.
Group 3
That was ours
Our Group (#3) Presentation
We had a difficult time coming up with a presentation topic. Initially we had played with the idea of doing a kind of skit or play type of thing where each person would play a character from one of Nabokov's books, and then possibly making the setting "Humbert Land." After discussing it, we couldn't decide how we would go about doing that and incorporating the theme of discovery into it.
The next idea that got brought into play was a game. After all, Nabokov is quite fond of games, especially chess. We initially came up with an extremely confusing idea in which there would be a question regarding 5 topics (memory, time, illusion, framing, and coincidence). Somehow we were trying to make the answer for each question correspond in a way with all of the other questions. However, a number of the group members found the game too confusing, and we figured it might be too confusing for the class as well so we nixed that idea. Next, we talked about doing a kind of jeopardy type game or possibly a cranium kind of thing where a representative from each team would come up and try to act out, draw, or sculpt something for their team to guess. This is similar to what we ended up with, but felt that we needed to participate more in the game, and so we decided to do the acting ourselves.
First we decided that we wanted the last question to be an anagram composed of the first letter of each answer. So we came up with the word "lepidoptera." It was a word that we thought would be relatively hard to guess, although that didn't end up being the case. From there, we decided on answers who's first letters begin with letters in the final word and have to do with discoveries (a lot of them were literary allusions that we discussed in class) from the novels. Once we came up with those, each person was assigned certain ones to act out or draw, and we went from there.
The next idea that got brought into play was a game. After all, Nabokov is quite fond of games, especially chess. We initially came up with an extremely confusing idea in which there would be a question regarding 5 topics (memory, time, illusion, framing, and coincidence). Somehow we were trying to make the answer for each question correspond in a way with all of the other questions. However, a number of the group members found the game too confusing, and we figured it might be too confusing for the class as well so we nixed that idea. Next, we talked about doing a kind of jeopardy type game or possibly a cranium kind of thing where a representative from each team would come up and try to act out, draw, or sculpt something for their team to guess. This is similar to what we ended up with, but felt that we needed to participate more in the game, and so we decided to do the acting ourselves.
First we decided that we wanted the last question to be an anagram composed of the first letter of each answer. So we came up with the word "lepidoptera." It was a word that we thought would be relatively hard to guess, although that didn't end up being the case. From there, we decided on answers who's first letters begin with letters in the final word and have to do with discoveries (a lot of them were literary allusions that we discussed in class) from the novels. Once we came up with those, each person was assigned certain ones to act out or draw, and we went from there.
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Infinite Cats and Rungs
Last night my little sister, a senior at Bozeman Highschool, asked me to help her pick out a book to analyze for her AP English author paper. The paper has a required length of 10 to 15 pages, and can be on basically any significant book pre-approved by the teacher. Although they are not limited to it, each student was handed an extremely long list of suggested books to chose from. It included many expected authors, such as Jane Austen and Mark Twain, but to my surprise included a book from Vladimir Nabokov as well. It was not Lolita, quite arguably his most famous novel, but Pale Fire!
Upon seeing this I was taken aback. Had we not just written a short essay on the extreme complexity and never ending discoveries to be made in this very novel on our last test? How could any student, much less a highschool student with an extremely limited knowledge of literature, be expected to analyze Pale Fire in 15 pages or less? The thought is absolutely absurd! One could not even write a great analyses about the index in 15 pages, much less the whole book.
I just found the thought of attempting to write such a paper amusing, in fact it makes me chuckle. I know that if I had chosen it as the book to write my paper on when I was in the same class, I would have panicked and absolutely gone out of my mind. You would be quite unpleasantly surprised after doing even a minute amount of research. If I had to write a paper analyzing the entire novel now, even after all of our conversations in class about the novel, I would still go crazy. One would have to write an entire book in order to even begin to shed light upon the infinitely deep shadows that make up Pale Fire.Whoever put that book on the list has obviously either never read it, or just not understood even the most basic parts of it. A book with infinite levels of understanding and never ending supply of cats to be taken out of the bag is most definitely not a good candidate for this paper.
Upon seeing this I was taken aback. Had we not just written a short essay on the extreme complexity and never ending discoveries to be made in this very novel on our last test? How could any student, much less a highschool student with an extremely limited knowledge of literature, be expected to analyze Pale Fire in 15 pages or less? The thought is absolutely absurd! One could not even write a great analyses about the index in 15 pages, much less the whole book.
I just found the thought of attempting to write such a paper amusing, in fact it makes me chuckle. I know that if I had chosen it as the book to write my paper on when I was in the same class, I would have panicked and absolutely gone out of my mind. You would be quite unpleasantly surprised after doing even a minute amount of research. If I had to write a paper analyzing the entire novel now, even after all of our conversations in class about the novel, I would still go crazy. One would have to write an entire book in order to even begin to shed light upon the infinitely deep shadows that make up Pale Fire.Whoever put that book on the list has obviously either never read it, or just not understood even the most basic parts of it. A book with infinite levels of understanding and never ending supply of cats to be taken out of the bag is most definitely not a good candidate for this paper.
Friday, November 13, 2009
Lolita vs Lilith
I stumbled upon something interesting that kind of connects with Lolita being presented as an Eve like character.
While going through names that sound similar to Lolita, I found the name Lilith. It is of Babylonian origin, and means "belonging to the night." I thought that was kind of funny because night or darkness generally represents evil and can be used to represent temptation, and Lolita is most definitely characterised as a temptress. However, that is not all. According to middle aged legends, Lilith was also the names of Adam's (as in Adam and Eve) first wife. I don't come from a particularly religious family, so I'm not sure if that is generally taught when speaking about Genesis, but this was news to me. Apparently, as the legend goes Lilith refused to obey Adam, and as a result she was turned into a demon and Eve was created to take her place.
I just found this interesting because it ties into my paper topic in kind of a weird way.
While going through names that sound similar to Lolita, I found the name Lilith. It is of Babylonian origin, and means "belonging to the night." I thought that was kind of funny because night or darkness generally represents evil and can be used to represent temptation, and Lolita is most definitely characterised as a temptress. However, that is not all. According to middle aged legends, Lilith was also the names of Adam's (as in Adam and Eve) first wife. I don't come from a particularly religious family, so I'm not sure if that is generally taught when speaking about Genesis, but this was news to me. Apparently, as the legend goes Lilith refused to obey Adam, and as a result she was turned into a demon and Eve was created to take her place.
I just found this interesting because it ties into my paper topic in kind of a weird way.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
